<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5973961</id><updated>2011-04-21T13:36:19.749-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Collaborative IQ</title><subtitle type='html'>A space to develop my ideas on such topics as economics, policy and politics.  Tough, constructive criticism and lively discussion are most welcome. </subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://collaborativeiq.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://collaborativeiq.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Abby</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>12</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5973961.post-112308775065502400</id><published>2005-08-03T09:47:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-08-03T09:49:10.663-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Audit value?How is this for an assessment of audit value?  From a little internet correspondence:The work product of auditors, by and large for Fortune 1000 companies, is complete bullshit. The first thing they taught us about valuation analysis is that public disclosure is complete crap, and that's the general tune of all of Wall Street...and they by and large determine valuation and trading </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/112308775065502400'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/112308775065502400'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://collaborativeiq.blogspot.com/2005_08_01_archive.html#112308775065502400' title=''/><author><name>Abby</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5973961.post-112266834804007742</id><published>2005-07-29T13:15:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-07-29T13:19:08.046-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Real world expertise?Maybe Cox will be better than the rest of us at sniffing out fraud and financial malfeasence -- he's got some relevant experience, after all:    THE lawyer solemnly told regulators it would be far too costly for a mutual fund to seek appraisals of its assets, and no appraisals were made. When employees of the investment firm suspected something was amiss, they were reassured </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/112266834804007742'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/112266834804007742'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://collaborativeiq.blogspot.com/2005_07_01_archive.html#112266834804007742' title=''/><author><name>Abby</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5973961.post-112265858992872660</id><published>2005-07-29T10:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-07-29T10:36:29.933-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Palmkin Demolition Part IDear Palmkin,I don't know how to respond to you civilly, so I will blog instead.  Viva la Internet!  I am opperating on the assumption that this will fly under all radar screens and therefore remain essentially private.  If not -- oops!I plan on responding to little chuncks of your letter as the mood strikes, so chunk one:"Overall, we believe that the RFP question about </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/112265858992872660'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/112265858992872660'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://collaborativeiq.blogspot.com/2005_07_01_archive.html#112265858992872660' title=''/><author><name>Abby</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5973961.post-112224974817406218</id><published>2005-07-24T17:01:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-07-24T17:02:28.180-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Maybe I'm back...we'll see if I have a moment to actually write anything, but I've been having bloggish urges lately...</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/112224974817406218'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/112224974817406218'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://collaborativeiq.blogspot.com/2005_07_01_archive.html#112224974817406218' title=''/><author><name>Abby</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5973961.post-107721513840173591</id><published>2004-02-19T10:25:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2004-02-19T10:28:38.530-08:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>The Candidate is Dead, Long Live the CandidateSo Dean is out, Kerry is in (my affections, that is--let's see if my talent at picking losers kills Kerry's campaign).  I'm starting to like the idea of Kerry sailing into the presidency with his craggy, presidential visage.  Dean is his bulldog, keeping those of us madder than hell at Bush happy, while Kerry can appear above the fray for those </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/107721513840173591'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/107721513840173591'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://collaborativeiq.blogspot.com/2004_02_01_archive.html#107721513840173591' title=''/><author><name>Abby</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5973961.post-107522178539136766</id><published>2004-01-27T08:43:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2004-01-27T08:46:33.936-08:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Musings on Dean IISome reasons I STILL want Dean to win, despite the tumult of the past week and the increasingly impressive performances of his rivals:1.  Dean is an open book.  What you see is what you get, which is why he is so hard to catagorize--he is a complex person and it is all there to see.  It is a breath of fresh air after the (very different) dishonesties of our past two </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/107522178539136766'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/107522178539136766'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://collaborativeiq.blogspot.com/2004_01_01_archive.html#107522178539136766' title=''/><author><name>Abby</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5973961.post-107522097292295468</id><published>2004-01-27T08:29:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2004-01-27T08:31:42.090-08:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Musings on Dean ISo I have broken my New Year's resolution to write regularly, but I'll try to get better.  I just got an interesting piece on why Dean may have faltered so badly in Iowa.  I don't know if it is right, but it is certainly an intriguing theory:Is Social Software Bad for the Dean Camapign?   I'm getting the same cognitive dissonance listening to politicalhandicappers explain </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/107522097292295468'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/107522097292295468'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://collaborativeiq.blogspot.com/2004_01_01_archive.html#107522097292295468' title=''/><author><name>Abby</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5973961.post-107263623493336815</id><published>2003-12-28T10:30:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2003-12-28T10:34:53.823-08:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Happy New YearI've been away for a long time, but one of my new year's resolutions is to write here regularly.  I've discovered that I actually have a reader or two, and in the interest of not losing you, I promise to attempt writing something interesting on a regular basis.  My current obsession is the Howard Dean campaign.  Along with finding his politics mostly attractive (though I hope </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/107263623493336815'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/107263623493336815'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://collaborativeiq.blogspot.com/2003_12_01_archive.html#107263623493336815' title=''/><author><name>Abby</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5973961.post-106823147214796749</id><published>2003-11-07T10:57:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2003-11-07T10:59:52.723-08:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>"Honesty is wealth, or turpitudinal peccadilloes"The class I am taking on "Incentives and Organizations" has offered an unanticipated joy.  Many of the articles we are reading were written before economists discovered mathematics and, in doing so, forgot the beauties of the English language.  One particular gem that inspired today's title is Alchian and Demsetz's "Production, Information Costs,</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/106823147214796749'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/106823147214796749'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://collaborativeiq.blogspot.com/2003_11_01_archive.html#106823147214796749' title=''/><author><name>Abby</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5973961.post-106720706563340222</id><published>2003-10-26T14:24:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2003-10-26T14:24:26.273-08:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>The New SATI recently read the article in Time Magazine about the new SAT (Cover story, this week: http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101031027/story.html), and it got me thinking about one of my favorite topics, standardized tests.  While I am ambivalent about the described changes, I think on balance it will probably be a loss.  Gaston Caperton, the president of the College Board, is ordering </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/106720706563340222'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/106720706563340222'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://collaborativeiq.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106720706563340222' title=''/><author><name>Abby</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5973961.post-106686527925717117</id><published>2003-10-22T16:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-22T18:06:05.820-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Solution for Iraq?One idea I haven't seen batting around in the peanut gallery of commentators on the Iraq situation is the idea of handing out oil dividends to the Iraqi people.  What if the US announced that, as soon as logistically feasible, every Iraqi who registers with the US gets a share of the Iraq oil revenues until such a time as there is a legitimate, sovereign government of Iraq?  </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/106686527925717117'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/106686527925717117'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://collaborativeiq.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106686527925717117' title=''/><author><name>Abby</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5973961.post-106678551145980554</id><published>2003-10-21T18:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-21T18:18:31.420-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Welcome to Collaborative IQ, a blogspace to develop ideas about economics, policy and politics (and anything else that has captured my attention).  I believe ideas never fully develop until they are exposed to the light of others' thoughts and criticisms.  This blog is my way to expose my ideas to such an inspection by a wider, and hopefully more diverse, audience than I get in my insular world </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/106678551145980554'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5973961/posts/default/106678551145980554'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://collaborativeiq.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106678551145980554' title=''/><author><name>Abby</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>
